Internet Archive v. Publishers: When Does a Library Become a Pirate Site?
There is something deeply respectable about a library.
Shelves.
Dust.
Silence.
A librarian who can detect a whisper from three rooms away.
Nobody looks at a public library and thinks:
Organized copyright crime.
Then Internet Archive took the basic library idea, connected it to a scanner and the internet, and discovered that the difference between “library” and “pirate site” can apparently be one PDF file.
The case was Hachette Book Group v. Internet Archive.
Four major publishers — Hachette, HarperCollins, Wiley and Penguin Random House — sued the nonprofit Internet Archive over its digital book-lending program.
Internet Archive said it was doing what libraries had always done.
Buying books.
Lending books.
Serving readers.
The publishers said:
No.
You bought paper.
Then you manufactured unauthorized e-books.
That distinction eventually decided the case.
The One Book, One Borrower Theory
Internet Archive’s system was called Controlled Digital Lending.
The basic idea was surprisingly elegant.
Suppose Internet Archive owns one physical copy of a book.
It scans the book.
The physical copy is removed from circulation.
One user may borrow the digital scan.
When the digital loan expires, another user may borrow it.
One owned copy.
One borrower.
No multiplication.
At least in theory.
That matters because ordinary libraries already have the legal right to lend physical books they own.
The first-sale doctrine allows the owner of a lawful copy to resell or lend that particular copy without asking the copyright owner every time.
So Internet Archive asked an obvious question:
Why should the format matter?
If a library may lend the physical object, why can it not lend a controlled digital surrogate instead?
That argument has a certain brutal common sense.
Unfortunately, copyright law contains another brutal fact.
Scanning a book creates a new copy.
The Problem Was the Scanner
That is where the publishers attacked.
When a library lends you a paper book, no new book is created.
The same object changes hands.
When Internet Archive scanned the book, it reproduced the entire copyrighted work.
Then it distributed that reproduction digitally.
That invokes rights the copyright owner still controls.
The publishers therefore argued that Controlled Digital Lending was not merely lending.
It was copying first, lending second.
And copying an entire book without permission requires a legal defense.
Internet Archive relied on fair use.
The courts rejected it.
“But We’re a Library”
The word “library” did a lot of emotional work in this case.
Internet Archive is a nonprofit.
Its mission is preservation and access.
Its Wayback Machine is one of the most important archives ever created.
Libraries perform an obvious public good.
All of that is true.
It was also not enough.
The Second Circuit emphasized that a public benefit does not automatically transform copyright infringement into fair use.
If increasing public access alone were enough, practically every pirate site could submit the same defense:
People like free books.
The court was not impressed.
This is where the case becomes uncomfortable.
Internet Archive’s moral argument may be attractive.
Copyright law was asking a different question.
Not:
Is this useful?
But:
Who has the legal right to make the copy?
The E-Book Market Was Sitting Right There
The publishers had another devastating fact.
They already licensed e-books to libraries.
That meant Internet Archive was not creating access in a vacuum.
A functioning commercial market existed.
Libraries could obtain authorized digital editions.
Publishers could charge for them.
Authors and publishers could receive compensation.
Then Internet Archive arrived and created its own digital editions from print copies.
From the publishers’ perspective, this was not preservation.
It was substitution.
Why should a library pay for an authorized e-book license if it can buy one cheap paperback, scan it and generate its own lending copy?
That market effect weighed heavily against Internet Archive.
One-to-One Did Not Save It
Internet Archive’s strongest practical defense was the one-copy/one-user restriction.
It was not allowing unlimited simultaneous downloads under ordinary Controlled Digital Lending.
If it owned ten physical copies, it could lend ten digital copies.
The system tried to mimic physical scarcity.
But the appeals court still rejected the fair-use argument.
Why?
Because artificial scarcity does not erase the act of reproduction.
A new digital copy had still been made.
The fact that software limited how many people could borrow it at once did not convert the copy into the original paper book.
This is an important copyright lesson.
Technology can simulate ownership rules.
It cannot necessarily simulate legal rights.
Then COVID Arrived and Everything Got Worse
And then Internet Archive made a decision that provided the publishers with the litigation equivalent of gasoline.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, when libraries and schools were closing, Internet Archive launched the National Emergency Library.
For a period, it suspended the one-copy/one-user limitation.
Multiple users could borrow digital scans simultaneously.
Internet Archive presented this as an emergency response to unprecedented closures.
Publishers saw something else:
The allegedly “controlled” system suddenly stopped being controlled.
That program became a highly visible part of the public controversy.
Legally, however, the broader Controlled Digital Lending theory was already enough to lose the case.
The courts rejected the core fair-use defense even under the ordinary one-copy/one-user model.
A Library Can Still Infringe Copyright
This may be the simplest lesson in the entire case.
Good intentions do not create an exemption from copyright.
Nonprofit status does not create an exemption.
Preservation does not automatically create an exemption.
Calling something a library does not create an exemption.
Libraries have specific privileges under copyright law.
They do not have a general right to manufacture substitute editions of copyrighted books.
Internet Archive tried to stretch traditional library behavior into the digital world.
The courts decided it stretched too far.
But the Publishers’ Victory Is Not Morally Clean Either
This is where the story gets more interesting.
Publishers absolutely have legitimate rights.
They finance editing.
Production.
Distribution.
Marketing.
Advances.
Authors deserve compensation.
Digital licenses have economic value.
All true.
But library e-book licensing is also notoriously different from buying physical books.
A physical library book can sit on a shelf for decades.
An e-book license may come with restrictions, expiration rules, lending limits and recurring costs.
Libraries do not necessarily “own” digital books in the same durable way they own paper copies.
That creates a strange future.
Culture becomes digital.
Libraries become increasingly dependent on licensing contracts.
Publishers retain technological control long after the purchase.
And the old idea of a library actually owning its collection begins to weaken.
Internet Archive tried to solve that problem with technology.
The court said copyright law did not permit its solution.
The problem itself remains.
Ownership Is Becoming Permission
This case is really about the difference between owning an object and licensing information.
Buy a printed book.
You own that copy.
Lend it.
Sell it.
Give it away.
Leave it to your grandchildren.
Put it under a table leg.
Copyright has very little to say about those later transactions.
Buy access to a digital book?
Now the contract matters.
The platform matters.
The license matters.
The server matters.
The publisher’s terms matter.
You may possess access without possessing a durable copy you control.
Internet Archive tried to reconstruct the old physical-library model in this digital environment.
Publishers insisted that digital reproduction remains a separate copyright event.
The courts agreed.
The Appeal Failed
In September 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment against Internet Archive.
The appellate court held that copying entire copyrighted books and distributing those digital copies online for free was not fair use, even under the one-owned-to-one-loaned system.
Internet Archive could have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.
It did not.
The deadline passed in December 2024.
That made the Second Circuit decision the effective end of the fight.
The Settlement Has a Number. You Just Can’t See It.
The parties negotiated a permanent injunction.
Internet Archive is prohibited from offering unauthorized copies of covered publishers’ books under its Controlled Digital Lending theory.
There was also money.
How much?
Secret.
The settlement contains a confidential payment, and the Association of American Publishers later said the payment would substantially compensate its significant legal fees and costs.
Which is wonderfully appropriate.
A lawsuit about access to information ended with information nobody is allowed to access.
Copyright has a sense of humor.
So Was Internet Archive a Pirate Site?
Legally, the publishers won.
That matters.
The courts rejected Internet Archive’s fair-use theory.
But “pirate site” is still a loaded description.
Internet Archive did not behave like a typical commercial piracy operation.
It bought physical books.
It restricted lending.
It operated as a nonprofit.
It articulated a library theory.
It believed it was extending traditional lending into a digital environment.
Those facts explain why intelligent people supported it.
They did not make the copying lawful.
Both propositions can exist simultaneously.
Internet Archive was not The Pirate Bay.
And its lending program infringed copyright.
Reality is irritating like that.
Both Sides Were Defending Something Real
Internet Archive was defending an old idea:
A library should be able to own books and lend them.
Publishers were defending another old idea:
Only the copyright holder decides who may create new copies.
Digital technology forced those ideas into collision.
Paper libraries survived because lending did not require reproduction.
Digital lending does.
That single technical fact changes everything.
The scanner sits between two centuries of law.
When Does a Library Become a Pirate Site?
Not when it lends a book.
Not when it preserves a book.
Not merely because it digitizes something under circumstances copyright law permits.
The line appears when the institution creates and distributes unauthorized substitute copies without a legal exception strong enough to cover the act.
That is where Internet Archive lost.
Its mistake was believing that controlling the number of borrowers could make a newly manufactured digital copy legally equivalent to the physical book sitting in storage.
The courts said it could not.
And that leaves us with a miserable but fascinating conclusion.
The publishers were right:
A purchased paperback does not automatically include the right to manufacture an e-book.
Internet Archive was also pointing at a real problem:
A world where libraries permanently own less and merely license more is a very different world from the one libraries were invented for.
Copyright law settled the lawsuit.
It did not settle that problem.
So when does a library become a pirate site?
Apparently—
when the scanner creates a copy the library never bought.
Copyright Registration will cost - $7
Public offer - read carefully before registration!
SciReg Terms of Service
1. General Provisions
These Terms of Service ("Terms") constitute a legally binding agreement between you ("Customer," "User," or "you") and SolCity Nav, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("SciReg," "Company," "we," "our," or "us"), governing your access to and use of the SciReg website and all related services.
By creating an Account, submitting Registration(s), uploading Submitted Materials, purchasing Registration(s), or otherwise using the Service, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to be bound by these Terms.
If you do not agree to these Terms, you must not access or use the Service.
The Company reserves the right to modify these Terms at any time. Revised Terms become effective immediately upon publication on the SciReg website. Your continued use of the Service after publication of revised Terms constitutes your acceptance of those revisions.
2. Definitions
For purposes of these Terms:
Account means a registered user account created through the SciReg website.
Customer means any individual or legal entity using the Service.
Service means the SciReg website and all services provided by SolCity Nav, LLC.
Registration means the submission of information and Submitted Materials through the Service for creation of a Registration Record.
Registration Record means the electronic record created and maintained by SciReg containing information supplied by the Customer together with the assigned registration number and registration date.
Registration Certificate means the electronic certificate generated by SciReg confirming creation of a Registration Record.
Submitted Materials means any files, documents, manuscripts, publications, software, databases, images, audiovisual works, research materials, or other content submitted by the Customer through the Service.
3. Description of the Service
SciReg is an independent online registration and publication service that enables Customers to create dated electronic Registration Records for intellectual works and other Submitted Materials.
For each accepted Registration, SciReg may:
- assign a unique registration number;
- record the date and time of Registration;
- maintain a Registration Record;
- securely store Submitted Materials;
- apply a digital signature to the Submitted Materials to enable verification of their integrity and detection of any subsequent modifications;
- generate and issue a Registration Certificate;
- apply a digital signature to the Registration Certificate to enable verification of its authenticity and integrity;
- publish Registration information where publication is selected or otherwise authorized by the Customer.
SciReg operates as a private commercial service and is not affiliated with any governmental authority.
4. Nature of the Service
SciReg is an independent private registration service.
SciReg is not:
- a government copyright office;
- a patent office;
- a trademark office;
- a governmental registration authority;
- a court of law;
- a notary public;
- an arbitration tribunal.
SciReg does not:
- determine authorship;
- determine ownership of intellectual property rights;
- verify the identity of Customers;
- verify the accuracy of submitted information;
- verify originality of Submitted Materials;
- determine whether Submitted Materials qualify for copyright or other legal protection under any jurisdiction;
- provide legal advice or legal opinions;
- resolve disputes concerning ownership or intellectual property rights.
SciReg creates Registration Records solely on the basis of information provided by the Customer. The Company does not independently verify the identity of the Customer or the accuracy, completeness, legality, ownership, originality, authenticity, or legal status of any Submitted Materials.
A Registration Certificate confirms only that SciReg received specified information and Submitted Materials, created a Registration Record, assigned a registration number, and recorded the corresponding date and time of Registration.
A Registration Certificate is not a governmental registration, is not evidence of ownership or authorship, does not establish the existence or validity of copyright or any other intellectual property rights, and does not constitute a legal opinion, certification, adjudication, or governmental act.
5. Registration Procedure
To create a Registration Record, the Customer must:
- Create a SciReg Account or sign in to an existing Account.
- Complete the Registration form by providing the required information.
- Upload the Submitted Materials. Each Registration may include one archive file not exceeding 7 MB in size.
- Pay the applicable Registration fee, unless the Registration qualifies for a free Registration offered by the Company.
- Submit the Registration through the Service.
Upon successful completion of the Registration process and receipt of payment, if applicable, SciReg will create a Registration Record, assign a unique registration number, record the date and time of Registration, and make a Registration Certificate available to the Customer.
As part of a completed Registration, SciReg applies a digital signature to the Submitted Materials and the Registration Certificate. The digital signature is intended to verify the integrity of the signed files, confirm that the Registration Certificate originated from SciReg, and detect any subsequent modifications to the signed files.
The Company reserves the right to reject or cancel any Registration that violates these Terms or applicable law.
6. Registration Fees
The Company may offer free Registrations and paid Registrations.
Unless otherwise stated on the SciReg website:
- the first two (2) Registrations submitted by a Customer are provided free of charge;
- each additional Registration is subject to a fee of US $7.00.
Registration fees are subject to change at any time. Any revised fees apply only to Registrations submitted after publication of the updated pricing.
All payments are non-refundable except where required by applicable law or expressly approved by the Company in its sole discretion.
Taxes, duties, bank charges, currency conversion fees, and similar charges imposed by third parties remain the sole responsibility of the Customer.
7. Customer Responsibilities
The Customer represents and warrants that:
- the Customer has the legal right to submit the Submitted Materials;
- the Submitted Materials do not knowingly violate any applicable law;
- the Submitted Materials do not knowingly infringe the intellectual property or other legal rights of any third party;
- all information provided during Registration is accurate and complete to the best of the Customer's knowledge.
The Customer is solely responsible for the content, legality, accuracy, ownership, and use of all Submitted Materials.
If Submitted Materials contain confidential, proprietary, trade secret, personal, or otherwise sensitive information, the Customer is solely responsible for determining whether submission to the Service is appropriate.
The Customer remains solely responsible for determining whether any AI-generated or AI-assisted materials qualify for copyright or other legal protection under applicable law.
8. License Granted to SciReg
The Customer retains all ownership and intellectual property rights in the Submitted Materials.
By submitting materials through the Service, the Customer grants SciReg a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to:
- receive and process the Submitted Materials;
- create and maintain Registration Records;
- store backup copies;
- generate Registration Certificates;
- reproduce Submitted Materials as reasonably necessary for operation of the Service;
- publish Registration information where publication is selected or authorized by the Customer.
This license exists solely for the purpose of operating the Service and terminates when continued retention is no longer required for operation of the Service, legal compliance, dispute resolution, or legitimate business purposes.
Nothing in these Terms transfers ownership of the Submitted Materials to the Company.
9. Prohibited Use
The Customer agrees not to use the Service:
- for unlawful purposes;
- to submit malicious software or harmful code;
- to upload material that intentionally infringes the rights of third parties;
- to interfere with operation or security of the Service;
- to attempt unauthorized access to Company systems or other user Accounts;
- to submit false or misleading Registration information.
The Company reserves the right to refuse, suspend, remove, or terminate any Registration or Account that violates these Terms or applicable law without prior notice.
10. Privacy
The Company collects, stores, and processes personal information solely for the purpose of operating the Service, maintaining Registration Records, communicating with Customers, processing payments, complying with legal obligations, preventing fraud, and improving the Service.
The Company does not sell Customers' personal information to third parties.
By using the Service, the Customer consents to such processing of personal information.
11. Electronic Communications
The Customer agrees that all notices, disclosures, Registration Certificates, invoices, receipts, and other communications provided electronically by the Company satisfy any legal requirement that such communications be in writing.
12. Intellectual Property
The SciReg website, software, design, logos, trademarks, text, graphics, databases, and all other materials provided by the Company are the exclusive property of SolCity Nav, LLC or its licensors and are protected by applicable intellectual property laws.
Except as expressly permitted by these Terms, no part of the Service may be copied, reproduced, modified, distributed, reverse engineered, or otherwise used without the Company's prior written permission.
13. Availability of the Service
The Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to keep the Service available.
However, SciReg does not guarantee uninterrupted operation or continuous availability.
The Service may be modified, suspended, restricted, or discontinued at any time without prior notice.
The Company may perform maintenance, upgrades, security improvements, or other technical operations that temporarily interrupt the availability of the Service.
14. Disclaimer of Warranties
THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE."
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE COMPANY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR AVAILABILITY.
THE COMPANY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT:
- THE SERVICE WILL OPERATE WITHOUT INTERRUPTION;
- THE SERVICE WILL BE ERROR-FREE;
- DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED;
- THE SERVICE WILL ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE;
- THE SERVICE WILL MEET THE CUSTOMER'S EXPECTATIONS OR PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS.
15. Limitation of Liability
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, SOLCITY NAV, LLC, ITS OWNERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, AGENTS, AND AFFILIATES SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF GOODWILL, OR INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE USE OF THE SERVICE.
THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM:
- INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CUSTOMERS;
- UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS;
- THIRD-PARTY ACTIONS;
- INTERNET FAILURES;
- FORCE MAJEURE EVENTS;
- VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL SOFTWARE NOT CAUSED BY THE COMPANY'S GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT.
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY ARISING OUT OF ANY CLAIM RELATING TO THE SERVICE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID BY THE CUSTOMER FOR THE REGISTRATION GIVING RISE TO THE CLAIM.
16. Indemnification
The Customer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless SolCity Nav, LLC, its owners, directors, officers, employees, contractors, and affiliates from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys' fees arising out of:
- the Customer's use of the Service;
- Submitted Materials;
- violation of these Terms;
- violation of applicable law;
- infringement of any third-party rights.
17. Suspension and Termination
The Company may suspend, restrict, or terminate any Account or Registration at any time if the Company reasonably believes that:
- these Terms have been violated;
- applicable law has been violated;
- continued use of the Service may expose the Company to legal or financial risk;
- fraudulent or abusive activity has occurred.
Termination of an Account does not affect rights and obligations that accrued prior to termination.
The Company may retain Registration Records where required by law, for dispute resolution, fraud prevention, security, or legitimate business purposes.
18. Governing Law and Jurisdiction
These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, United States, without regard to its conflict of law principles.
Any legal action arising out of or relating to these Terms or the Service shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in the State of Delaware, and the Customer irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of those courts.
19. Severability
If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
20. Entire Agreement
These Terms, together with the Privacy Policy, Refund Policy, and any other legal policies published by the Company, constitute the entire agreement between the Customer and SolCity Nav, LLC concerning the Service and supersede all prior understandings relating to the same subject matter.
21. Contact Information
SolCity Nav, LLC
651 North Broad Street
Middletown, Delaware 19709
United States
E-mail: scireg@scireg.org
Website: https://scireg.org
