Getty Images v. Stability AI: Where Are the Stolen Pictures? Inside the Machine?
Copyright law likes objects.
Books.
Photographs.
Films.
Files.
Copies.
Things you can point at and say:
There. That is mine.
Artificial intelligence is much less cooperative.
An AI model may be trained on millions or billions of images and then emerge as a gigantic mathematical structure consisting of parameters, weights and relationships.
So when Getty Images sued Stability AI over Stable Diffusion, one of the most interesting questions was almost absurdly simple:
Where are the pictures?
Getty said Stability AI had trained its image-generation system using copyrighted works.
Fine.
But what did that make the resulting model?
A machine that learned from the images?
Or a gigantic infringing copy containing them in another form?
That distinction became one of the central legal problems in the UK case.
Getty Had a Very Attractive Theory
Getty Images owns or licenses an enormous photographic library.
Stable Diffusion became famous precisely because it could generate sophisticated images from text prompts.
Getty alleged that Stability AI had used large numbers of Getty-controlled images in developing the system.
That already created the familiar AI-training argument:
Can copyrighted material be used for machine learning without permission?
But Getty also pushed a more aggressive theory under UK law.
It argued, in substance, that the imported Stable Diffusion model itself could amount to an infringing “article” because copyrighted works had been reproduced during its creation.
That theory was extremely important.
If successful, it could mean that an AI model trained abroad on copyrighted works might enter the United Kingdom already carrying infringement inside it.
Not merely because of what the model outputs.
Because of what the model is.
That is a terrifying proposition for AI companies.
The Model Is Not a ZIP File
The difficulty is technical.
Stable Diffusion does not function like a hard drive containing millions of original photographs in neat folders.
A trained model contains mathematical parameters.
It learns statistical relationships from training data.
Those parameters can influence what the system generates.
But influence is not the same thing as storage.
That distinction became fatal to Getty’s secondary-infringement theory.
The High Court rejected the claim that the model itself was an infringing copy or article merely because protected works had been used during training.
That sounds obvious once stated plainly.
A model trained on photographs is not necessarily a digital suitcase full of photographs.
But copyright law was written for copies.
And AI systems are forcing courts to decide how far the idea of “copy” can stretch before it stops meaning anything useful.
If Nothing Is Stored, What Was Taken?
This is where the case becomes wonderfully philosophical.
Suppose an AI model studies a photograph.
The training process adjusts internal parameters.
The original image is not retained as a conventional file.
The model later generates a new picture influenced by patterns learned from millions of images.
Where is the copyrighted work?
In the training dataset?
Certainly possible.
In temporary copies created during training?
Possibly relevant.
In the final model?
That is much harder.
If the model does not contain a recognizable stored copy of the protected work, calling the model itself an infringing copy becomes legally awkward.
Getty tried to bridge that gap.
The court refused.
Copyright Law Wants Something It Can Touch
Traditional copyright disputes are wonderfully physical by comparison.
Someone photocopies a book.
There is the book.
There is the photocopy.
Someone duplicates a photograph.
There is the original file.
There is the duplicate.
Someone pirates a film.
There is the movie file.
AI training breaks this comfortable geometry.
The original material enters a computational process.
The process changes billions of numerical values.
The resulting model may retain information about styles, shapes, concepts and visual relationships.
But not necessarily the original works as conventional reproductions.
So copyright law faces a nasty problem:
How much learned information must remain before “learning” becomes “copying”?
Nobody has a universally satisfying answer.
Getty Did Not Lose Everything
This is important.
The UK case did not end with a declaration that Stability AI had done nothing wrong.
Nor did the court rule that AI training on copyrighted images is universally lawful.
The November 2025 judgment dealt with particular claims under UK law.
Getty’s case also included trademark issues and other allegations involving Stability AI’s system and outputs.
So the correct headline is not:
“Getty Loses AI Copyright Case.”
That would be too simple.
A better headline is:
“One of Getty’s Biggest Copyright Theories Collapses.”
That is more accurate.
And more interesting.
The Watermark Problem
Getty’s dispute with Stability AI became especially famous because generated images were sometimes alleged to contain distorted versions of Getty Images watermarks.
That is spectacularly bad optics.
If an AI system produces something resembling a Getty watermark, the public reaction is immediate:
Obviously it copied Getty.
Technically and legally, however, things are more complicated.
A distorted watermark may suggest that Getty material appeared in training data.
It does not automatically prove that the trained model itself contains stored copies of particular photographs.
Again the distinction is between:
what the model learned from
and
what the model contains.
That distinction sounds microscopic.
It can decide entire causes of action.
AI Copyright Is Becoming a Battle Over Definitions
What is a copy?
What is reproduction?
What is storage?
What is an article?
What does it mean for information to exist “inside” a neural network?
These are no longer academic questions.
They determine liability.
AI companies naturally prefer a narrow answer.
The model contains mathematics.
Not photographs.
Copyright owners prefer a broader one.
If protected expression went into the machine and influenced what came out, they ask why copyright should vanish merely because the intermediate representation became complicated.
Both positions have intuitive force.
That is why these cases are so difficult.
The Machine May Remember Without Containing
Human memory offers an uncomfortable analogy.
You can look at a photograph and remember it.
You do not literally contain the photograph.
You contain information about it.
AI companies love that comparison.
The machine learns too.
But machines are commercial products.
They can be copied perfectly.
Distributed globally.
Run millions of times.
And generate outputs on demand.
So courts cannot simply say:
“Humans learn from pictures, therefore machines may do the same.”
The scale and mechanics are entirely different.
Still, Getty’s failed theory shows the opposite extreme has problems too.
You cannot necessarily say:
“The model learned from copyrighted images, therefore the model itself is a copyrighted copy.”
There has to be something more precise.
The Case Partly Evaporated Because the Object Disappeared
That is the strangest thing about Getty v. Stability AI.
Copyright law went looking for the stolen picture.
Getty pointed at the model.
The court looked inside the legal theory and effectively said:
That is not the picture.
The model may have been trained using protected works.
It may generate controversial outputs.
It may raise other copyright and trademark issues.
But the model itself was not automatically an infringing article simply because copyrighted images had participated in its creation.
That distinction matters enormously.
Because if AI models themselves were treated as infringing copies of everything used to train them, the legal exposure would be almost impossible to contain.
Every distributed model could become a box full of millions of alleged infringements.
The UK court declined to go that far.
So Where Are the Stolen Pictures?
That leaves the question hanging.
Were copies made during training?
Were those copies lawful?
Were they made in the UK?
Do outputs infringe particular works?
Do trademarks appear unlawfully?
Those are separate questions.
But the grand theory — that the trained model itself was effectively a container full of copied Getty images — did not survive.
And that may be the most important lesson.
Artificial intelligence is forcing copyright law to stop using metaphors and start identifying the actual act of copying.
Not:
“The machine learned from us.”
But:
What was reproduced?
Where?
When?
In what form?
Because copyright infringement still needs a copy somewhere.
And if the picture is not inside the machine—
you have to find where it is.
Copyright Registration will cost - $7
Public offer - read carefully before registration!
SciReg Terms of Service
1. General Provisions
These Terms of Service ("Terms") constitute a legally binding agreement between you ("Customer," "User," or "you") and SolCity Nav, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("SciReg," "Company," "we," "our," or "us"), governing your access to and use of the SciReg website and all related services.
By creating an Account, submitting Registration(s), uploading Submitted Materials, purchasing Registration(s), or otherwise using the Service, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to be bound by these Terms.
If you do not agree to these Terms, you must not access or use the Service.
The Company reserves the right to modify these Terms at any time. Revised Terms become effective immediately upon publication on the SciReg website. Your continued use of the Service after publication of revised Terms constitutes your acceptance of those revisions.
2. Definitions
For purposes of these Terms:
Account means a registered user account created through the SciReg website.
Customer means any individual or legal entity using the Service.
Service means the SciReg website and all services provided by SolCity Nav, LLC.
Registration means the submission of information and Submitted Materials through the Service for creation of a Registration Record.
Registration Record means the electronic record created and maintained by SciReg containing information supplied by the Customer together with the assigned registration number and registration date.
Registration Certificate means the electronic certificate generated by SciReg confirming creation of a Registration Record.
Submitted Materials means any files, documents, manuscripts, publications, software, databases, images, audiovisual works, research materials, or other content submitted by the Customer through the Service.
3. Description of the Service
SciReg is an independent online registration and publication service that enables Customers to create dated electronic Registration Records for intellectual works and other Submitted Materials.
For each accepted Registration, SciReg may:
- assign a unique registration number;
- record the date and time of Registration;
- maintain a Registration Record;
- securely store Submitted Materials;
- apply a digital signature to the Submitted Materials to enable verification of their integrity and detection of any subsequent modifications;
- generate and issue a Registration Certificate;
- apply a digital signature to the Registration Certificate to enable verification of its authenticity and integrity;
- publish Registration information where publication is selected or otherwise authorized by the Customer.
SciReg operates as a private commercial service and is not affiliated with any governmental authority.
4. Nature of the Service
SciReg is an independent private registration service.
SciReg is not:
- a government copyright office;
- a patent office;
- a trademark office;
- a governmental registration authority;
- a court of law;
- a notary public;
- an arbitration tribunal.
SciReg does not:
- determine authorship;
- determine ownership of intellectual property rights;
- verify the identity of Customers;
- verify the accuracy of submitted information;
- verify originality of Submitted Materials;
- determine whether Submitted Materials qualify for copyright or other legal protection under any jurisdiction;
- provide legal advice or legal opinions;
- resolve disputes concerning ownership or intellectual property rights.
SciReg creates Registration Records solely on the basis of information provided by the Customer. The Company does not independently verify the identity of the Customer or the accuracy, completeness, legality, ownership, originality, authenticity, or legal status of any Submitted Materials.
A Registration Certificate confirms only that SciReg received specified information and Submitted Materials, created a Registration Record, assigned a registration number, and recorded the corresponding date and time of Registration.
A Registration Certificate is not a governmental registration, is not evidence of ownership or authorship, does not establish the existence or validity of copyright or any other intellectual property rights, and does not constitute a legal opinion, certification, adjudication, or governmental act.
5. Registration Procedure
To create a Registration Record, the Customer must:
- Create a SciReg Account or sign in to an existing Account.
- Complete the Registration form by providing the required information.
- Upload the Submitted Materials. Each Registration may include one archive file not exceeding 7 MB in size.
- Pay the applicable Registration fee, unless the Registration qualifies for a free Registration offered by the Company.
- Submit the Registration through the Service.
Upon successful completion of the Registration process and receipt of payment, if applicable, SciReg will create a Registration Record, assign a unique registration number, record the date and time of Registration, and make a Registration Certificate available to the Customer.
As part of a completed Registration, SciReg applies a digital signature to the Submitted Materials and the Registration Certificate. The digital signature is intended to verify the integrity of the signed files, confirm that the Registration Certificate originated from SciReg, and detect any subsequent modifications to the signed files.
The Company reserves the right to reject or cancel any Registration that violates these Terms or applicable law.
6. Registration Fees
The Company may offer free Registrations and paid Registrations.
Unless otherwise stated on the SciReg website:
- the first two (2) Registrations submitted by a Customer are provided free of charge;
- each additional Registration is subject to a fee of US $7.00.
Registration fees are subject to change at any time. Any revised fees apply only to Registrations submitted after publication of the updated pricing.
All payments are non-refundable except where required by applicable law or expressly approved by the Company in its sole discretion.
Taxes, duties, bank charges, currency conversion fees, and similar charges imposed by third parties remain the sole responsibility of the Customer.
7. Customer Responsibilities
The Customer represents and warrants that:
- the Customer has the legal right to submit the Submitted Materials;
- the Submitted Materials do not knowingly violate any applicable law;
- the Submitted Materials do not knowingly infringe the intellectual property or other legal rights of any third party;
- all information provided during Registration is accurate and complete to the best of the Customer's knowledge.
The Customer is solely responsible for the content, legality, accuracy, ownership, and use of all Submitted Materials.
If Submitted Materials contain confidential, proprietary, trade secret, personal, or otherwise sensitive information, the Customer is solely responsible for determining whether submission to the Service is appropriate.
The Customer remains solely responsible for determining whether any AI-generated or AI-assisted materials qualify for copyright or other legal protection under applicable law.
8. License Granted to SciReg
The Customer retains all ownership and intellectual property rights in the Submitted Materials.
By submitting materials through the Service, the Customer grants SciReg a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to:
- receive and process the Submitted Materials;
- create and maintain Registration Records;
- store backup copies;
- generate Registration Certificates;
- reproduce Submitted Materials as reasonably necessary for operation of the Service;
- publish Registration information where publication is selected or authorized by the Customer.
This license exists solely for the purpose of operating the Service and terminates when continued retention is no longer required for operation of the Service, legal compliance, dispute resolution, or legitimate business purposes.
Nothing in these Terms transfers ownership of the Submitted Materials to the Company.
9. Prohibited Use
The Customer agrees not to use the Service:
- for unlawful purposes;
- to submit malicious software or harmful code;
- to upload material that intentionally infringes the rights of third parties;
- to interfere with operation or security of the Service;
- to attempt unauthorized access to Company systems or other user Accounts;
- to submit false or misleading Registration information.
The Company reserves the right to refuse, suspend, remove, or terminate any Registration or Account that violates these Terms or applicable law without prior notice.
10. Privacy
The Company collects, stores, and processes personal information solely for the purpose of operating the Service, maintaining Registration Records, communicating with Customers, processing payments, complying with legal obligations, preventing fraud, and improving the Service.
The Company does not sell Customers' personal information to third parties.
By using the Service, the Customer consents to such processing of personal information.
11. Electronic Communications
The Customer agrees that all notices, disclosures, Registration Certificates, invoices, receipts, and other communications provided electronically by the Company satisfy any legal requirement that such communications be in writing.
12. Intellectual Property
The SciReg website, software, design, logos, trademarks, text, graphics, databases, and all other materials provided by the Company are the exclusive property of SolCity Nav, LLC or its licensors and are protected by applicable intellectual property laws.
Except as expressly permitted by these Terms, no part of the Service may be copied, reproduced, modified, distributed, reverse engineered, or otherwise used without the Company's prior written permission.
13. Availability of the Service
The Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to keep the Service available.
However, SciReg does not guarantee uninterrupted operation or continuous availability.
The Service may be modified, suspended, restricted, or discontinued at any time without prior notice.
The Company may perform maintenance, upgrades, security improvements, or other technical operations that temporarily interrupt the availability of the Service.
14. Disclaimer of Warranties
THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE."
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE COMPANY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR AVAILABILITY.
THE COMPANY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT:
- THE SERVICE WILL OPERATE WITHOUT INTERRUPTION;
- THE SERVICE WILL BE ERROR-FREE;
- DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED;
- THE SERVICE WILL ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE;
- THE SERVICE WILL MEET THE CUSTOMER'S EXPECTATIONS OR PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS.
15. Limitation of Liability
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, SOLCITY NAV, LLC, ITS OWNERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, AGENTS, AND AFFILIATES SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF GOODWILL, OR INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE USE OF THE SERVICE.
THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM:
- INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CUSTOMERS;
- UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS;
- THIRD-PARTY ACTIONS;
- INTERNET FAILURES;
- FORCE MAJEURE EVENTS;
- VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL SOFTWARE NOT CAUSED BY THE COMPANY'S GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT.
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY ARISING OUT OF ANY CLAIM RELATING TO THE SERVICE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID BY THE CUSTOMER FOR THE REGISTRATION GIVING RISE TO THE CLAIM.
16. Indemnification
The Customer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless SolCity Nav, LLC, its owners, directors, officers, employees, contractors, and affiliates from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys' fees arising out of:
- the Customer's use of the Service;
- Submitted Materials;
- violation of these Terms;
- violation of applicable law;
- infringement of any third-party rights.
17. Suspension and Termination
The Company may suspend, restrict, or terminate any Account or Registration at any time if the Company reasonably believes that:
- these Terms have been violated;
- applicable law has been violated;
- continued use of the Service may expose the Company to legal or financial risk;
- fraudulent or abusive activity has occurred.
Termination of an Account does not affect rights and obligations that accrued prior to termination.
The Company may retain Registration Records where required by law, for dispute resolution, fraud prevention, security, or legitimate business purposes.
18. Governing Law and Jurisdiction
These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, United States, without regard to its conflict of law principles.
Any legal action arising out of or relating to these Terms or the Service shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in the State of Delaware, and the Customer irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of those courts.
19. Severability
If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
20. Entire Agreement
These Terms, together with the Privacy Policy, Refund Policy, and any other legal policies published by the Company, constitute the entire agreement between the Customer and SolCity Nav, LLC concerning the Service and supersede all prior understandings relating to the same subject matter.
21. Contact Information
SolCity Nav, LLC
651 North Broad Street
Middletown, Delaware 19709
United States
E-mail: scireg@scireg.org
Website: https://scireg.org
